Not Just the Boss
December 8, 2009, 4:34 pm
Filed under: Employee Engagement, Employee Retention, Executive Leadership

I recently read an article titled “It’s Always About the Boss” that was published in Gallup’s Management Journal.

Always?  Really?

I know.  I know.  You’ve heard it before – and probably even said it – “People don’t leave their companies, they leave their managers.”  But research just doesn’t back that up.  It is not always the boss.

Just to be clear – I’m not saying that the boss isn’t important to building engagement and retaining employees.  I agree that an immediate manager has a huge impact on employee engagement, productivity, and retention.  Most of us can probably name a favorite boss that inspired us to go beyond what we thought we could do.  And a bad boss can definitely drive an employee away.  But for most employees, a good boss cannot make up for other more fundamental elements of the employment equation.

For example, Questar recently asked more than 1000 employees across industries and companies about their employer – their work, boss, coworkers, recognition, and career growth opportunities, as well as senior leadership, climate for service, and individual alignment with company values.  Among employees who were actively looking for another job, 60% reported that their manager was not very effective.  Clearly the boss is important.  So what was even more important?  Believe it or not – trust in senior leadership.  Among those same employees who were looking for another job, an even greater number (68%) said they do not trust senior leadership for their current employer.

And it seems to be a trend.  For many of our clients, attitudes about the boss have taken a back seat to trust in senior leadership and alignment with company values in driving important outcomes such as employee engagement and commitment.  It’s not that the boss is no longer important.  But in these times of constant reorganization, mergers, bailouts, and bankruptcies, maybe employees are more likely to look beyond their immediate boss – to think about how their own future may be linked to the future of the organization that employs them.

Anna Erickson Ph. D. | Director, Consulting Services


4 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I agree with you that having trust in senior leadership comprises a critical element in employee satisfaction; and with the reasons you’ve cited for this being so.

I’m not certain that your point is very different from the one presented in the Gallup article. If ‘boss’ is only seen to identify a middle manager in the equation then sure, but in a larger view that boss could be a VP or a Chief Officer who is setting the tone for the managers and supervisors who report to them.

Or, to use your example, the senior executive who is, in whatever way, not inspiring trust among those that they lead – that is the boss that is the source of the friction that the employees are reacting to.

Comment by Eric

Good point. “The boss” could include the “boss’ boss” as well. And it is the immediate manager that often conveys information about the company’s values, direction, and strategy. I thought the points in the Gallup article itself were very good. My most negative reaction was to the title.

At Questar, we have seen a real shift over the years in the data we gather for our clients. The immediate manager used to be more important in driving engagement. Today belief in senior leadership and alignment with company values are much more important. Maybe it’s the constant reorganization in some of these companies. (Why would an employee leave because of their boss? They’re likely to have a new boss in a couple of months. Or maybe it’s seeing some of the big companies fail.)

Thanks for your comment!

Comment by Questar

Anna this is very interesting! I think the reason its both senior and local management is that local management does not exist in a vacuum. They were selected in the first place by someone senior to them based on overt or covert values inherent in the company culture, and whether they “fit” those; their ongoing behavior is guided also by that culture.

I also think that if your data are reflected in a widespread way, i.e. that there is a shift to senior management being more important in engagement, issues like the overwhelmingly large gap in pay between the average US CEO and workers (around 300:1, copmpared to 25:1 or less in Europe) will even more seriously undermine any attempts to pretend that “we are all in this together” and resulting morale/engagement. See my post on this at:
http://davidbowles.wordpress.com/2010/03/15/executive-excess-eroding-employee-morale-and-engagement-at-work/

best to you

David

David Bowles, Ph.D.
co-author, Employee Morale: Driving Performance in Challenging Times (Macmillan, Nov 2009)
http://www.moraleatwork.com

Comment by David Bowles

Thanks David. You make a very good point. I wonder if “the new normal,” post-recession world will see a decrease in those large pay gaps. Thanks for sharing your insight!

Comment by Questar




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>